Understanding sex as self-injury behaviour

Today, sex as self-injury behaviour is a well-used concept in healthcare, in the media and in women's and girls' shelters. But the phenomenon is still relatively unexplored as a field of research and there is no scientifically based definition of ’sex as self-injury’.

There is an idea that certain sexual practices are perceived as so disgusting that no human could imagine doing them voluntarily.

Ingrid Wall

In a recently published article in the peer-reviewed academic journal Sexualities, Ingrid Wall and Sara Johnsdotter have taken a closer look at how the phenomenon has been described in Swedish newspapers and radio programmes from 2008 to 2019. The study shows that the media played a crucial role in establishing the concept.

The starting point for the use of the term sex as self-injury coincided with a book published 14 years ago about a teenage girl who alleviates the trauma caused by rape by selling sex.

“What was very clear in the media was that in many cases they referred directly to that book and considered its author Caroline Engvall as an expert,” says Wall.

In the media's descriptions, it is often about young girls who have sex with older men, it is described as violent sex and a large part is also connected with selling sex. It is also mentioned that it is precisely about alleviating anxiety, and the anxiety is said to come from trying to process a sexual trauma.

The analysis of the material uses the anthropologist Gayle Rubin's sex hierarchy, which shows which sexual practices and relationships are considered normative. Sex as self-injury behaviour can be seen as that which ends up in the outer circle, the non-normative and deviant. In the media's descriptions of the phenomenon, two dominant discourses emerge.

Partly it is the pathological discourse, where sex as self-injury is described as an illness that is equated with different types of addictions and other types of self-injury behaviours, and partly it is the moralistic discourse, where it is certain sexual practices that are problematised and moralised.

According to the study, the two discourses interact in the media coverage. When sex as self-injury behaviour is described as something sick, it also legitimises a moralistic view of what is good and bad sexuality.

“There is an idea that certain sexual practices are perceived as so disgusting that no human could imagine doing them voluntarily. The risk with this type of description is that you reinforce normative notions about what is bad or good sexuality,” says Wall, adding:

“My hope is that I will have the opportunity to conduct more research on the subject that that further involves young people, so that we know what we are talking about and whether there is reason to use the term or not.”

Text: Anna Dahlbeck & Adrian Grist